1 March, 2001
Communiqué #13 Princeton University report on World Bank
Accountability
THE CHIXOY DAM & THE MASSACRES AT RIO NEGRO, AGUA FRIA, XOCOC
& LOS ENCUENTROS: A Report on Multilateral Financial Institution
Accountability, Submitted to the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights
The Working Group on Multilateral Institution Accountability
Graduate Policy Workshop: Human Rights and Non-State Actors
Woodrow Wilson School Princeton University
- Contact: info@rightsaction.org
www.rightsaction.org
- Please copy and redistribute or publish this information
- Let us know if you would like to support the Chixoy Dam/Rio
Negro Massacres Reparations Campaign
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
World Bank Accountability
Structure of the Report
Legal Accountability
Recommendations
CONTACT INFORMATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [for information on how to obtain a full report,
click here]
Guatemala's Pueblo Viejo-Quixal dam, more commonly referred to
as the Chixoy dam, was built during the late 1970s and early 1980s,
at the height of the country's violent civil war. Funded largely
by the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the
dam is associated with many serious allegations of human rights
abuses, including:
- the displacement of several communities without proper warning
or compensation; and
- massacres suffered by the Rio Negro community, in their home
community of Rio Negro, and in Xococ, Agua Fria and Los Encuentros.
The UN-sponsored Commission for Historical Clarification specifically
cited the Rio Negro massacre as a case study to illustrate its conclusion
that genocide was perpetrated against Guatemala's indigenous Mayan
population during the civil war.
World Bank Accountability
This report reviews conflicting claims of World Bank accountability
for human rights violations that occurred in relation to the Chixoy
dam project. Though allegations of responsibility for such violations
extend to many other actors involved with the dam (i.e. the Guatemalan
government and military, as well as the Guatemalan National Institute
of Electrification, INDE), it is the issue of multilateral institution
accountability which remains the most neglected.
Several options exist for addressing this issue. However, we chose
a UN-led solution, due to its direct organizational relationship
with the World Bank as well as its broad, international mandate.
Although the report focuses on the World Bank, IDB responsibility
also remains an area of similar serious concern.
Although the abuses in question occurred nearly twenty years ago,
the issue of World Bank accountability for project-related human
rights abuses remains extremely relevant to this day. Firstly, the
impact of the violations is still be felt and lived. That is to
say, that the surviving victims are still alive, suffering the results
of the massacres and violations.
Secondly, the role that the World Bank played in Guatemala was
not an isolated case. For example, the recently approved Chad/Cameroon
pipeline, similar to the Chixoy Dam, will be constructed in a country,
namely Chad, that is engaged in civil conflict. In 1997, at least
80 unarmed civilians were killed in the Doba oil field where the
pipeline will be built, and in 1998, another 100 were killed, both
times by the Chadian government. Critics of the pipeline also worry
that its construction, which will necessarily result in the displacement
of members of the Baka and Bakola indigenous groups in Cameroon,
will not allow for adequate compensation since the Cameroonian government
does not officially recognize its indigenous populations. Adding
to these risks is the fact that the government of Cameroon has been
ranked the most corrupt in the world by Transparency International.
Despite these concerns, the World Bank still approved its $92.9
million dollar loan in June, 2000, arguing that the government of
Chad is making sufficient improvements.
The issue of World Bank accountability is also one of great importance
to the United Nations itself. When a specialized agency of the UN
faces accusations of complicity with genocide and crimes against
humanity, it would seem only proper for the UN to undertake a rigorous
review of problems arising in connection with the agency's activities.
forward >
^^ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
^ World Bank Accountability
Structure of the Report >
Legal Accountability >>
Recommendations >>>
CONTACT INFORMATION >>>>
|