January 17, 2010
Haiti Earthquake, #6
Sign-on letter to the New York Times.  Reject their “Blame the Victims” analysis
Dear friends, we are still only beginning to grasp the extent of death and destruction.  Please continue to read and re-distribute these Haiti Earthquake reports and encourage people to make donations.

SIGN-ON LETTER
Many have heard the racist, denigrating and harmful comments of Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh, blaming the Haitians for their own misery.  Pat and Rush speak for conservative, right-wing sectors of the republican party and U.S. society.
Below, an opinion piece by David Brooks, of the New York Times and a regular on NPR (National Public Radio).
‘Blaming the Haitians’ speech perpetuates ignorance about the underlying causes of death, destruction and vulnerability in Haiti, turning a blind eye to how the “international community” (including the governments of the USA, France, Canada, including the United Nations, Inter-American Development Bank) directly contributed to Haiti’s endemic poverty, exploitation and vulnerability.
Haiti is not a “failed” state; it is a state exploited and crushed by internal elites and the "international community".

Re-distribute this information all around
To get on/off our list-serv: http://www.rightsaction.org/lists/?p=subscribe&id=3
For more information: Grahame Russell, co-director, info@rightsaction.org, 860-352-2448
* * *
From the IJDH – Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti
(http://www.ijdh.org/, brianhaiti@aol.com)
Saturday, January 16, 2010
The way that Haiti is portrayed in the U.S. press has a strong impact on the way it is treated by the U.S. government. Yesterday, David Brooks wrote a column blaming Haiti’s poverty, and its vulnerability to earthquakes, in part on its culture. This column, by a respected writer in the New York Times, is infinitely more dangerous to Haitians than the more dismissible outrageous statements of Rush Limbaugh and Pat Robertson. It can help provide the intellectual foundation for decreasing urgently needed assistance and for paternalistic policies that will continue to disempower the Haitian government and its people.
Long-time Haiti activist and theologian Tom Driver and colleague Carl Lindskoog felt that Mr. Brooks’ statements required a response, and we agree.  Please consider adding your name to their open letter to David Brooks.
TO ADD YOUR NAME
1) follow this link: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AqKfDWgRAVV3dFZBZHlNSG90T25fSEp2UE9vSEZxTkE&hl=en
2) send an email to Blaine Bookey (blaine@ijdh.org) with your name, position and institution (for identification only).
* * * 
January 15, 2010
THE UNDERLYING TRAGEDY
NYT Op-Ed Columnist, By DAVID BROOKS
On Oct. 17, 1989, a major earthquake with a magnitude of 7.0 struck the Bay Area in Northern California. Sixty-three people were killed. This week, a major earthquake, also measuring a magnitude of 7.0, struck near Port-au-Prince, Haiti. The Red Cross estimates that between 45,000 and 50,000 people have died.
This is not a natural disaster story. This is a poverty story. It’s a story about poorly constructed buildings, bad infrastructure and terrible public services. On Thursday, President Obama told the people of Haiti: “You will not be forsaken; you will not be forgotten.” If he is going to remain faithful to that vow then he is going to have to use this tragedy as an occasion to rethink our approach to global poverty. He’s going to have to acknowledge a few difficult truths.
The first of those truths is that we don’t know how to use aid to reduce poverty. Over the past few decades, the world has spent trillions of dollars to generate growth in the developing world. The countries that have not received much aid, like China, have seen tremendous growth and tremendous poverty reductions. The countries that have received aid, like Haiti, have not.
In the recent anthology “What Works in Development?,” a group of economists try to sort out what we’ve learned. The picture is grim. There are no policy levers that consistently correlate to increased growth. There is nearly zero correlation between how a developing economy does one decade and how it does the next. There is no consistently proven way to reduce corruption. Even improving governing institutions doesn’t seem to produce the expected results.
The chastened tone of these essays is captured by the economist Abhijit Banerjee: “It is not clear to us that the best way to get growth is to do growth policy of any form. Perhaps making growth happen is ultimately beyond our control.”
The second hard truth is that micro-aid is vital but insufficient. Given the failures of macrodevelopment, aid organizations often focus on microprojects. More than 10,000 organizations perform missions of this sort in Haiti. By some estimates, Haiti has more nongovernmental organizations per capita than any other place on earth. They are doing the Lord’s work, especially these days, but even a blizzard of these efforts does not seem to add up to comprehensive change.
Third, it is time to put the thorny issue of culture at the center of efforts to tackle global poverty. Why is Haiti so poor? Well, it has a history of oppression, slavery and colonialism. But so does Barbados, and Barbados is doing pretty well. Haiti has endured ruthless dictators, corruption and foreign invasions. But so has the Dominican Republic, and the D.R. is in much better shape. Haiti and the Dominican Republic share the same island and the same basic environment, yet the border between the two societies offers one of the starkest contrasts on earth — with trees and progress on one side, and deforestation and poverty and early death on the other.
As Lawrence E. Harrison explained in his book “The Central Liberal Truth,” Haiti, like most of the world’s poorest nations, suffers from a complex web of progress-resistant cultural influences. There is the influence of the voodoo religion, which spreads the message that life is capricious and planning futile. There are high levels of social mistrust. Responsibility is often not internalized. Child-rearing practices often involve neglect in the early years and harsh retribution when kids hit 9 or 10.
We’re all supposed to politely respect each other’s cultures. But some cultures are more progress-resistant than others, and a horrible tragedy was just exacerbated by one of them.
Fourth, it’s time to promote locally led paternalism. In this country, we first tried to tackle poverty by throwing money at it, just as we did abroad. Then we tried microcommunity efforts, just as we did abroad. But the programs that really work involve intrusive paternalism.
These programs, like the Harlem Children’s Zone and the No Excuses schools, are led by people who figure they don’t understand all the factors that have contributed to poverty, but they don’t care. They are going to replace parts of the local culture with a highly demanding, highly intensive culture of achievement — involving everything from new child-rearing practices to stricter schools to better job performance.
It’s time to take that approach abroad, too. It’s time to find self-confident local leaders who will create No Excuses countercultures in places like Haiti, surrounding people — maybe just in a neighborhood or a school — with middle-class assumptions, an achievement ethos and tough, measurable demands.
The late political scientist Samuel P. Huntington used to acknowledge that cultural change is hard, but cultures do change after major traumas. This earthquake is certainly a trauma. The only question is whether the outside world continues with the same old, same old.
* * *
AN OPEN LETTER TO DAVID BROOKS ON HAITI
Dear Mr. Brooks,
In your January 15, 2010 opinion piece in The New York Times, “The Underlying Tragedy,” you present what you seem to believe is a bold assessment of the situation in Haiti and what you certainly know is a provocative recommendation for Haiti’s future. You also offer some advice to President Obama. In order to successfully keep his promise to the people of Haiti that they “will not be forsaken” nor “forgotten” the President, you say, has to “acknowledge a few difficult truths.”
What follows, however, is so shockingly ignorant of Haitian history and culture and so saturated with the language and ideology of cultural imperialism that no valuable “truths” remain.
Please allow us, therefore, to present you with some more accurate truths.
First, Haiti is not a clear-cut case of the failure of international aid to achieve poverty reduction. For almost its entire existence Haiti has been shouldered with a load of immense international debt. The Haitian people had the audacity to break their chains and declare independence in 1804 but were later forced by France to re-purchase their freedom for 150 million Francs, a burden that the country has had to carry throughout the twentieth century.
What’s more, the “aid” Haiti has received from its powerful neighbor to the North has never been the sort that would help the country reduce poverty or achieve meaningful development.
In the early-twentieth century the principle “aid” Haiti received from the United States came in the form of a brutal military occupation that lasted from 1915 to 1934. After “Papa Doc” Duvalier ascended to power “aid” meant assistance to a ruthless (but conveniently anti-communist) dictator. The U.S. gave Duvalier $40.4 million in his first four years in power, briefly suspended military and economic assistance to the dictator in 1963, but resumed shortly thereafter, restoring full military and economic aid to Duvalier by 1969.
In the early 1970s and 1980s when “Baby Doc” Duvalier was at the helm, the “aid” the United States and other international agencies contributed failed to reduce poverty but did enrich foreign investors in the newly constructed assembly industry.
Economic policies that the U.S. forced upon Haiti decimated its agriculture for the benefit of American farming while driving Haiti’s peasants into Port-au-Prince and other cities where they found few jobs and scarce housing.
Four years after Baby Doc’s departure the Haitian people decided to help themselves by democratically electing a new leader, but the United States aided Jean-Bertrand Aristide’s domestic opponents in the coup of 1991 and did so again in 2004.
It is no wonder then, that that such “aid” from the United States has failed to lift Haiti out of poverty.
Equally unconvincing is your argument about “progress-resistant cultural influences,” which brings us to important truth number two: Haitian culture is not “progress-resistant” as anyone familiar with the examples you yourself provide can attest to. If Vodoun or “the voodoo religion” as you put it, “spreads the message that life is capricious and planning futile,” how do the majority of Haitians manage to survive on scant resources and less than two dollars-a-day?
How do so many Haitians manage to travel abroad, find and maintain difficult jobs, and send money back home if not through careful planning and a fierce defense of precious life? How do the nationwide customers of Fonkoze, the Haitian banking operation that teaches literacy and business practices to curbside marketers to whom it makes small loans, achieve such strong records of loan repayment?
In fact, it might be Haitian culture itself (and even Vodoun) which allows Haitians to persist. After all, the Vodou spirit Ogou (St. Jacques) is honored as a clever planner and master of skills.
So was the champion of Haiti’s war of independence, general Toussaint L’Ouverture, a onetime slave who entered history as a military and diplomatic genius.
The third important truth we have to offer (and we hope President Obama is listening as well) is the opposite of your call for “intrusive paternalism” as the solution to Haiti’s woes: Haiti does not need nor does it want the paternalism of the United States. Haiti is literally dying of cultural imperialism.
Whenever America’s leaders and pundits speak of subordinate peoples, the ideology of imperialism shines through. As it does in your words, Mr. Brooks, so it has done for far too many earlier Americans.
President William McKinley, for example, facing the difficult question of how he was to govern the newly-conquered Filipinos worried that left “to themselves they are unfit for self-government-and they would soon have anarchy and misrule . . . there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God's grace do the very best we could by them.”
Closer to home, those who worried about an earlier form of “progress-resistant cultural influences” decided it was better to remove the children of Native American families than to let them absorb the backwardness of their pagan and uncivilized parents and community. A common refrain by these “reformers” was “kill the Indian, save the man.”
And now, Mr. Brooks, you propose to save the Haitians from themselves by replacing Haitian cultural values and institutions with “middle-class assumptions, an achievement ethos and tough, measurable demands.”
Imperialism, whether economic or military, is the primary reason for the conditions that so worsened the impact of the earthquake on January 12. Haitians need less imperialism, not more.
During the Vietnam War an American officer famously stated that “it became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it.” Today Haiti is virtually destroyed. The earthquake having done the hard part, Mr. Brooks, you think “intrusive paternalism” will save it. Lacking a foundational understanding of Haitian history and culture, and bearing the familiar colors of American imperialism you and your ilk will do vastly more harm than good.
SIGNERS:
Tom F. Driver, Paul Tillich Professor Emeritus of Theology and Culture, Union Theological Seminary
Carl Lindskoog, Doctoral Candidate, Department of History, The Graduate Center, City University of New York
TO ADD YOUR NAME,
1) follow this link: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AqKfDWgRAVV3dFZBZHlNSG90T25fSEp2UE9vSEZxTkE&hl=en
2) send an email to Blaine Bookey (blaine@ijdh.org) with your name, position and institution (for identification only).
* * *
TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATIONS FOR RIGHTS ACTION’S "HAITI RELIEF" WORK
Make check payable to "Rights Action" and mail to:
UNITED STATES:  Box 50887, Washington DC, 20091-0887
CANADA:  552 - 351 Queen St. E, Toronto ON, M5A-1T8
Credit card donations: http://rightsaction.org/contributions.htm
Stock donations: Contact Grahame Russell, info@rightsaction.org
* * *
WHAT RIGHTS ACTION DOES WITH “DISASTER” RELIEF FUNDS
In 1998, RA provided hundreds of thousands of dollars of funds and support to Hurricane Mitch victims in Honduras.  In 2004-2005, RA raised and distributed emergency funds to community groups in Haiti in response to the dual crisis of the military coup against the government of President Aristide and a series of hurricanes and tropical storms that devastated Haiti through 2004 and into 2005.  In 2005-2006, RA provided hundreds of thousands of dollars of funds and support to Hurricane Stan victims in Guatemala.
With disaster relief funds, RA funds and supports existing community and shanty-town based organizations

RA does not have staff in Haiti, and will directly fund community and shanty-town based organizations and/or the organizations listed below.
HAITI-FOCUSED GROUPS WE RECOMMEND - Please contact and/or donate to these groups directly:
PARTNERS IN HEALTH: http://www.pih.org/home.html
IJDH - INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI:  http://www.ijdh.org
WORKING TOGETHER FOR HAITI:  http://www.konpay.org/ 
HAITI EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND: http://haitiaction.net/About/HERF/HERF.html 
* * *
www.rightsaction.org / info@rightsaction.org:  Rights Action (with tax-deductible status in Canada and USA) funds and works with community development, environmental justice, human rights and disaster relief organizations in Guatemala and Honduras, and also in El Salvador, Haiti, Oaxaca and Chiapas.  Rights Action educates about and is involved in activism related to the underlying local, national and global causes of poverty and exploitation, environmental destruction, human rights violations and disasters.
For more information: Grahame Russell, co-director, info@rightsaction.org, 860-352-2448
* * *
TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATIONS FOR RIGHTS ACTION’S "HAITI RELIEF" WORK
Make check payable to "Rights Action" and mail to:
UNITED STATES:  Box 50887, Washington DC, 20091-0887
CANADA:  552 - 351 Queen St. E, Toronto ON, M5A-1T8
Credit card donations: http://rightsaction.org/contributions.htm
Stock donations: Contact Grahame Russell, info@rightsaction.org
* * *

 

--
If you do not want to receive any more newsletters, this link

To update your preferences and to unsubscribe visit this link
Forward a Message to Someone this link

Powered by PHPlist2.10.5, © tincan ltd